Had It in Holland Park

Tabloid  paid a 16-year-old girl to quit school and pose for topless photos remains straight-faced while trying to expose BBC presenter who paid a 17-year-old for photos

The Sun newspaper today remains entirely straight-faced, despite a long and distinguished career spent paying vast amounts of money to potentially vulnerable teenagers to take their clothes off and be photographed.

The Sun newspaper, which has somehow managed to position itself as the moral voice of the nation amongst its readership, is calling for the BBC presenter to be named and shamed, despite doing much the same thing for decades. Sub-editor at the ‘newspaper’, Simon Williams, told us, “This BBC presenter is an absolute disgrace, and the BBC as a whole is as guilty as he is for not doing more about it. Any organisation that condones buying explicit photos from teenagers who should still be in school deserves to go bust and see its executives in prison.

“Well, no. That’s different. When we did it with Sam Fox, it was so EVERYONE could perv over the breasts of a really hot 16-year-old girl. This bloke did it in private, which makes it MUCH worse. “Yes it does. Shut up.” Meanwhile, some have explained that it’s possible to think both acts are pretty despicable, even if neither of them initially appears to be technically illegal.

BBC in crisis as presenter accused of paying teenager for explicit pictures is suspended
The Sun knows who has been suspended from the BBC and so does any journalist worth his salt. But they won;;t publish it because they like the sensationalist headlines: a BBBC presenter paid thousands of pounds for sexually explicit pictures.
    Incidentally, why did "the family" not contact the police? Did they trust the BBC better than the police?
And finally, how did the Sun know the calls were "panicked"? Did they hack them?The BBC presenter scandal has put the corporation in peril‘Institutional racism is rife’ in NHS, says psychiatry chief