Monday 18 February 2019

 

New York City to Ban Discrimination Based on Hair"
...based on the argument that hair is inherent to one’s race..."
Yes, the law itself is good: no reason on god's green earth for someone being penalized for a haircut.
But Hair is NOT inherent to one's race!  What a completely stupid idea; one that does not understand either "race" or "inherent".  The absolute illogic of the premise beggars belief: does it mean that dreadlocks will be banned for whites, even though it is a style from Crete (3500 BCE).  Does it mean a short cut with a left-hand part will be banned for blacks?
     Anybody should be entitled to wear their hair as they wish, as long as it doesn't enter my food.

Shamima Begum was ‘victim’ of Isis in Syria, and even Nazis had fair trial, says family lawyer
Of course she deserves a fair trial, and a treason sentence of 25 years -- preferably without parole

Female Dems see double standard in Klobuchar accusations
Double standard?    You mean that women can be bullies and be forgiven but men can't?


Exposing Amy Klobuchar’s Mistreatment Of Staff Is Not Sexist
Of course it is. Any criticism of a woman is sexist. Any criticism of a male is justice. Welcome to the world of Newspeak.

  1. Highly respected Senator Richard Burr, head of Senate Intelligence, said, after interviewing over 200 witnesses and studying over 2 million pages of documents, “WE HAVE FOUND NO COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA.” The Witch Hunt, so bad for our Country, must end!
  2. We don't believe him or you. You both have a conflict of interest. We will wait until the patriotic, incorruptible and independent Republican Robert Muller issues his report.

Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]