Wednesday, 11 January 2017
The FBI, Billary and the Donald
When the FBI says something about
Hillary, the Retroblicans all cheer it for being a fair, tough, independent and
objective law enforcement agency, while the Dumbocrats all whine that it is a
partisan tool of their opposition.
When the FBI says something about
Trump, the Dumbocrats all cheer it for being a fair, tough, independent and objective
law enforcement agency, while the Retroblicans all whine that it is a partisan
tool of their opposition.
Let’s try a couple of converse hypotheticals:
1) Suppose, for argument sake, the stuff about Trump and Russia is true
and that the Democrats agree that they will abide by whatever the Republicans
think we should do about it. What would the Republicans propose?
2) Suppose, for argument sake, the stuff about Hillary and E-mails is true
and that the Republicans agree that they will abide by whatever the Democrats
think we should do about it. What would the Democrats propose?
THE ‘GOLDEN SHOWER’ PRESIDENCY...
I always wondered how he got his hair that colour.
So politicians are blaming immigrants for the NHS crisis. How predictable
"...stop spiralling levels of immigration and reduce pressure on NHS..."
Stopping immigration would INCREASE pressure on the NHS, as we would no longer have enough doctors and nurses to provide even the services we have today, much less the services we want to have, but do not want to pay for.
So Phil McDuff, the author of this piece, is modern.
So he even starts thoughts with "so" when he is writing.
So he does it when the "so" adds nothing to the sentence.
So he even does it when the "so" distracts the reader from his meaning.
So how cool is that?
So he does it when the "so" adds nothing to the sentence.
So he even does it when the "so" distracts the reader from his meaning.
So how cool is that?
# posted by Had It in Holland Park @ 05:55 
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Post a Comment