Wednesday, 11 January 2017

The FBI, Billary and the Donald
         When the FBI says something about Hillary, the Retroblicans all cheer it for being a fair, tough, independent and objective law enforcement agency, while the Dumbocrats all whine that it is a partisan tool of their opposition.  
        When the FBI says something about Trump, the Dumbocrats all cheer it for being a fair, tough, independent and objective law enforcement agency, while the Retroblicans all whine that it is a partisan tool of their opposition.
         Let’s try a couple of converse hypotheticals:
 1) Suppose, for argument sake, the stuff about Trump and Russia is true and that the Democrats agree that they will abide by whatever the Republicans think we should do about it. What would the Republicans propose?
 2) Suppose, for argument sake, the stuff about Hillary and E-mails is true and that the Republicans agree that they will abide by whatever the Democrats think we should do about it. What would the Democrats propose?

        That is, could we try to suppose, for just one moment and as hard as it may be to do emotionally, that the security and integrity of the United States of America is more important than scoring points off the other party?

THE ‘GOLDEN SHOWER’ PRESIDENCY...
I always wondered how he got his hair that colour.

So politicians are blaming immigrants for the NHS crisis. How predictable
"...stop spiralling levels of immigration and reduce pressure on NHS..."
        Stopping immigration would INCREASE pressure on the NHS, as we would no longer have enough doctors and nurses to provide even the services we have today, much less the services we want to have, but do not want to pay for.
      So Phil McDuff, the author of this piece, is modern.
      So he even starts thoughts with "so" when he is writing.
      So he does it when the "so" adds nothing to the sentence.
      So he even does it when the "so" distracts the reader from his meaning.
      So how cool is that?

No comments:

Post a Comment