Wednesday, 27 August 2014
"Judge Blames Poor Rape Conviction Statistics On Female
Inebriation" says the lead-in headline.
Well, Huffpo, actually she didn't. She said that women who were excessively
inebriated and had poor recall of the event had a harder time winning their
case in a he said / she said contest.
Meanwhile, Ms Russel
proposes two VERY, VERY scary changes to our judicial system: 1) If a person is
incapacitated through drink or drugs then he is not capable of being held
responsible for his actions and 2) the legal responsibility is on the
defendants to prove themselves innocent, not on the accusers to prove them
guilty.
Tax dodging is illegal. Following the law to minimize the amount
of tax one pays is both legal and something that most of us do once each year.
Of course Republican and Democratic congress people profited from companies doing this: it is one of the reasons why they wrote the laws that way.
Of course Republican and Democratic congress people profited from companies doing this: it is one of the reasons why they wrote the laws that way.
Pope Francis to China: Why not? You do.
There is a group of starving homeless. If you take them into
your home, they will survive. If not they will die. It costs you 1300 quid a
year to feed each one. How many will you accept?
What will you tell the 10th person who applies?
What will you tell the 100th?
the 1000th?
It
is just lazy journalists. If they really were hot on this topic, they'd have
interviewed Him long ago. If god really wanted anyone to believe, He'd have granted
the interview.
"the only solution is for the Mexican government to
provide Central American migrants with some form of document allowing them to
travel freely through the country"
That is: the only
solution is for Mexico to ignore its own laws and do what non-citizens tell it
to do.
And the only
solution for the US is to take in and care for people who are too cowardly or
too lazy to change their own country for the better.
Apparently, they are willing to “risk life
and limb” to run away, but will not do the same to change their own
country. Rather than stop the violence
and poverty at home, they export it to other countries.
I remember that: people putting Christians in arm locks and
holding guns to their heads to FORCE them to deny their beliefs. Happens all
the time, right?
‘
“this baby-faced schoolboy is believed to
be one of the Islamic State's youngest jihadists”
ISIS are NOT jihadi, they are haram
perverters of Islam.
ISIS are mohareb and Allah will judge them harshly.
Gosh, you mean he carried on while being accused of something he
didn't do?
Drat! There went that mode of silencing people we don't agree with. I thought one could simply accuse someone of something and that would take them out of the picture until the investigation was completed.
Drat! There went that mode of silencing people we don't agree with. I thought one could simply accuse someone of something and that would take them out of the picture until the investigation was completed.
PS: Good on ya, Shirley. You've done
good work.
AND set a good example along the way.
AND set a good example along the way.
Thank you, Mr Amin, for your thoughtful ideas.
I agree that it
is the mosques and imams who have failed the young generation of Muslims, not
to mention the general Muslim community. Both remain strangely silent in the
face of atrocities committed by mohareb perverters of the faith.
It is hard to
know whether this springs from 1) fear, 2) apathy, 3) indifference or 4) a
secret feeling that infidels are getting what they deserve
Ooooh! I wonder if any jet jockeys from the US, Russia, EU,
China or some other country have ever done this before?
# posted by Had It in Holland Park @ 05:30 
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
Post a Comment