Wednesday, 11 November 2009

 
Afghan war is bad for security
Independent poll casts doubt on key justification for Britain's involvement
Nice bias   had_it wrote:Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 10:26 am (UTC)
46% is not less than half, but almost half
"involvement in the conflict, with its rising toll of casualties"
      The independnt has been trying to drive the UK public into abandoning the Afghan people for the past 3 years. Why?  What is their agenda?   Is it just the modern desire for all political journalists to be a member of the opposition to whomever they cover? Or do the Independent's owners have some deeper financial interest in a civil war or a failed state in Afghanistan?
[info]corporeal_v001 wrote: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 at 10:52 am (UT
How would you feel if the UK was invaded?
[info]had_it replied:
Well, that actually happened!  In 1941, US forces invaded England because some taliban-like group called Nazi's were trying to take over Britain. As I recall, although there were some problems, the British people didn't seem to mind too much on the whole.

# posted by Had It in Holland Park @ 03:42
Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]